Case Details

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 1947 of 2018 Birendra Singhania Versus Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. SB Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Motion 13/07/18 Priyanka Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P. R. Patankar, counsel for respondent No. 1 – Bank. Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondent No. 2 / State. List this case before a Bench in which I (Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.) am not a member. Looking to the urgency in the matter, AR(J) is directed to do the needful expeditiously. SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No.1947 of 2018 Birendra Singhania Versus Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & anr. 16/07/2018 ashu Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri PR Patankar, Advocate for the Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that since he is to seek instructions from respondent No.1, which is at Mumbai, therefore, he may be given two weeks' time. In the meanwhile, it is been submitted that they will not make mention before the Tehsildar for execution of the possession of the house and also prays time to file reply and argument on interim petition. Since the undertaking has been given, it is directed that for two weeks' possession part of the order shall not be put to execution. List it after two weeks. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 1947 of 2018 Birendra Singhania -Versus- Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Anr. 09.08.2018 Ashok Mr. Satish Agrawal with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. P.R.Patankar, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. S.K.Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State/ Respondent No.2. Heard At the joint request of learned counsel appearing for the parties, list this case on 14th September, 2018. Interim protection shall further continue till the next date of hearing. Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 1947 of 2018 Birendra Singhania Versus Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. 17/09/2018 Heard Shri Satish Agrawal, Adv. for the petitioner, Shri P.R. Patankar, Adv. for the respondent No.1 and Shri Sameer Behar, PL for the State. As prayed, post it on 23-10-2018. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 1947 of 2018 Birendra Singhania Versus Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Anr. 23/10/2018 Barve Shri Satish Agrawal with Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Agrawal with Shri PR Patankar, counsel for respondent No.1. Smt. Astha Shukla, PL for the State. As prayed by the parties, post the matter on 27.11.2018. IR to continue till the next date of hearing. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra)

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1947 of 2018  Birendra Singhania, S/o Shri Malooram Singhania, Aged About 56 Years 24/186 Tatya Para, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. 6th Floor, 12 BKC Plot No. 21 G, Block Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai 400051 2. The Collector, District Raipur, Raipur, Collectorate Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Satish Agrawal with Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocates. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Sanjay Agrawal with Shri Vedant Bhelonde, Advocates on behalf of Shri PR Patankar, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Smt. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 27/11/2018 : 1. In view of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the matter of M/s Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh through District Magistrate Ghaziabad & Another {2018 (14) SCALE 543}, the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition is required to be agitated before the jurisdictional DRT under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002. It is ordered accordingly. 2. Needless to say, it will remain open for all the parties to agitate all questions, both factual and legal before the DRT. 3. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. 4. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue only for a period of 2 weeks from today. CC today. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve