Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd Vs Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt
Case Details
 Case Type | CS (COMM.) |
 Filing Number | 16881/2019 |
 Registration Number | 684/2019 |
 Filing Date | 02-11-2019 |
 Registration Date | 04-11-2019 |
 First Hearing Date | 04th November 2019 |
 Decision Date | 21st January 2020 |
 Case Status | Case Disposed |
 Court Number and Judge | 762-District Judge (Commercial Courts)-01; |
 Nature of Disposal | Uncontested--Rejected; |
Petitioners & Respondents
Petitioner Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd, ;
.svg){kind=icon}
Petitioner AdvocatePartap Singh;
Respondent NameLandmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt;
Order Details
| Order Date | 04-11-2019  |
IN THE COURT OF MS. RAVINDER BEDI, ADJ04 PATIALA HOUSE COURTS, NEW DELHI CS Comm NO. 684 of 2019 Darset Industries Pvt. Ld. Vs. Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt. Ltd. 04.11.2019 Fresh suit received on assignment. It be checked and registered, as per rules. Lawyers are abstaining from work in pursuance to the letter bearing Ref. no.NDBA/2019/1424 and No. 24065 dated 04.11.2019. Present: Sh. J.K.Bhardwaj, proxy counsel for plaintiff. Relist on 13.11.2019. (RAVINDER BEDI) Additional District Judge04 Judge Code: DL 0253 PHC/New Delhi/04.11.2019 |
Final Order Judgement
| Order Date | 21-01-2020 |
| 21012020 Dorset Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Landmark Housing Projects Chennai CS (COMM) No. 684/19 21.01.2020. Present : Ms. Parul Chopra, ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with Authorised Representative. Despite opportunity afforded, no amendment are carried out in terms of provisions of Commercial Courts Act 2015 particularly with respect to the filing of statement of truth under Order 6 Rule 15A and under Order 11 Rule 3 CPC as amended for Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and claim of interest under Order 7 Rule 2A CPC as amended for Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Be that as it may, I have gone through the contents of the plaint. This is a suit for recovery of Rs.10,61,407/-, brought by the plaintiff with respect to supply of goods/material to the defendant vide various invoices, with respect to which defendant has not made any payment. The copies of the invoices along with delivery receipts have been placed on record. On examining the documents, it is apparent that goods/material were supplied to the defendant by the plaintiff. Vide invoices/delivery receipts which pertain to the period November 2015 to March 2016. The suit for recovery for price of goods sold and delivered can be brought within three years from the date of the delivery of the goods in terms of Article 14 of the Schedule attached to Limitations Act 1963. In the present case, the goods were delivered on various occasions from period November 2015 to March 2016. The suit has been filed in November 2019 i.e. beyond the period of three years i.e. after the expiry of statutory period of limitation. The legal notice dated 28.11.2018 would not extend the period of limitation. The suit of the plaintiff is therefore barred under the Limitation Act 1963. The plaint is accordingly rejected. File be consigned to record room. ANJU BAJAJ CHANDNA District Judge (Commercial Court)-01 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 21.01.2020 |
Similar Cases
-
Ms Krbl Ltd.
VsWhite Fileds Overseas P. Ltd.
-
Iris Global Services Pvt Ltd
VsZenica Cars India Prrivate Limited
-
M/S Asahi India Glass Ltd
VsM/S Southern Auto Products Etc.
-
J K Lakshmi Cement Ltd
VsAmarpali Leasure Valley P Ltd
-
M/S A K International
VsM/S Grovalue Securities Pvt Ltd
-
Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd
VsLandmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt
}
Frequently Asked Questions
The Petitioner in case Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd vs Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt is Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd.
The Respondent in case Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd vs Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt is Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt.
The case against Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvtwas filed on 02-11-2019 by Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd.
The status of case Dorset Industries Pvt Ltd against Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Pvt is Case Disposed.