Kusum Vijayprakash Singh Vs Tata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd.
Case Details
 Case Type | M.A.C.P. |
 Filing Number | 114/2021 |
 Registration Number | 68/2021 |
 Filing Date | 18-01-2021 |
 Registration Date | 19-01-2021 |
 First Hearing Date | 30th March 2021 |
 Decision Date | 28th April 2021 |
 Case Status | Case Disposed |
 Court Number and Judge | 3-Member M.A.C.T. Thane; |
 Nature of Disposal | Uncontested--Compromise Before Evidence; |
Petitioners & Respondents
Petitioner Kusum Vijayprakash Singh, ;
.svg){kind=icon}
Petitioner AdvocateS L Mane;
Respondent NameYa Ali Tours Tranvels Prop Sayyed Ali Raza, Tata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd.;
Order Details
Order Details
Order not found.
Final Order Judgement
| Order Date | 28-04-2021  |
| Order below Exhibit 1 in M.A.C.P. No. 68/2021 [CNR :MHTH01-000473-2021] Mrs. Kusum Vijayprakash Singh ..Applicant V/s. 1. Shri. Ya Ali Tours Travels, Prop-Sayyed Ali Raza 2. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd ..Opponents The applicant is present with her advocate Shri. S.L.Mane before the court. The learned panel advocate for opponent no. 2 Shri. Balaji Umate is present on behalf of Shri. A. K. Tiwari alongwith authority letter (Exh.13) issued by the insurance company. Read the authority letter issued by the insurance company. The contents of the compromise pursis are read over and explained to both the parties. The parties admitted the contents of the consent pursis. As per compromise pursis (Exh.14), the claim petition is settled between the parties for a sum of Rs.80,000/- [rupees eighty thousand only] including the amount of N.F.L. In view of compromise pursis (Exh.14), I am inclined to pass following order - ORDER 1] Petition is allowed in terms of compromise. 2] Opponent no.2 do pay compensation of Rs.80,000/- [rupees eighty thousand only] including the amount of N.F.L. to the applicant within two months, failing which the amount shall carry interest @ 8% p.a. from the date of this order. 3] In view of settlement between the applicant and opponent no.2, opponent no.1 is absolved from the liability to pay the compensation. 4] On realization, entire amount be paid to the applicant by an account payee cheque, on due identification and verification. 5] Deficit court fee, if any, be recovered from the applicant as per rules. 6] Award be drawn up accordingly. Date : 28.04.2021 ( R. N. Rokade ) Member, M.A.C.T., Thane. |
Similar Cases
-
Inderjit Singh Balbir Singh Virani
VsTata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd.
-
Rushikesh Ravindranath @ Ravindra Bhise
VsThe Branch Manager, The National Insurance Co. Ltd.
-
Suman Raju Bhanusghare
VsIcici Lombard Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
-
Chandrakant Shridhar Shinde
VsM/S.Dilip Bildcon Limited
-
Arjun Ashok Pednekar
VsIcici Lombard Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
-
Kusum Vijayprakash Singh
VsTata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd.
}
Frequently Asked Questions
The Petitioner in case Kusum Vijayprakash Singh vs Tata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd. is Kusum Vijayprakash Singh.
The Respondent in case Kusum Vijayprakash Singh vs Tata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd. is Tata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd. and 2 more.
The case against Tata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd.was filed on 18-01-2021 by Kusum Vijayprakash Singh.
The status of case Kusum Vijayprakash Singh against Tata Aig Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd. is Case Disposed.