Mgvcl Vs Dhatu Forge Ltd
Case Details
 Case Type | CMA SC |
 Filing Number | 43/2017 |
 Registration Number | 43/2017 |
 Filing Date | 18-08-2017 |
 Registration Date | 18-08-2017 |
 First Hearing Date | 20th September 2017 |
 Decision Date | 27th October 2017 |
 Case Status | Case Disposed |
 Court Number and Judge | 3-Addl. Sr. Civil Judge & A.C.J.M.; |
 Nature of Disposal | Uncontested--Allowed; |
Petitioners & Respondents
Petitioner Mgvcl, ;
.svg){kind=icon}
Petitioner AdvocateR.M.Upadhyay;
Respondent NameDhatu Forge Ltd, Narendrakumar Radheshyam Shastri;
Order Details
Order Details
Order not found.
Final Order Judgement
| Order Date | 27-10-2017  |
| 1 Received on : 18.08.2017 Registered on : 18.08.2017 Decided on : 27.10.2017 Duration : Y M D In the Court of the Hon'ble Principal Senior Civil Judge Panchmahals at Halol Civil Misc. Appln. No. 43 of 2017 Applicant : Madya Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. Versus Opponents : 1. Dhatu Forge Ltd. 2. Shri Navendrakumar Radheshyam Misrty Application of Restoration of Sp.C.S.171/2000 The present application filed by the applicant, to restore the Sp.C.S. 171/2000. The facts of the case is that the Sp.C.S. 171/2000 filed by the applicant before Hon'ble Principal Senior Civil Judge Court, Godhra but on account of absent of applicant, the Sp.C.S. 171/2000 is dismissed for default by the Hon'ble Court on 22.11.2010. As per the provision of Limitation Act, within 30 days the application to re-open the suit would be file, but the applicant has not filed the application within limitation but C.M.A. 15/2013 has been allowed for condonation of delay. Heard the Ld. Advocate for the applicant. Read this application and papers on record. The present application has been given by the plaintiff for restoration the Sp.C.S. 171/2000. The Sp.C.S. 171/2000 dismissed on 22.11.2010. The Opponents have not 2 raised any objection in this application to restore the suit.case Looking to the facts of the case on hand, I am of the view that the reasons shown by the applicant seems to be genuine and are sufficient enough to restore the Sp.C.S. 171/2000. Under the circumstances, in the interest of Justice, I pass the following order. ORDER This application is allowed. Order for dismissal of the Sp.C.S. 171/2000 is set aside and it is hereby ordered to restore the Sp.C.S. 171/2000 on file for further hearing. Applicant has directed to proceed the matter without delay. No order as to costs. Pronounced and signed in the open Court today on 27th, October, 2017 Date : 27.10.2017. Place : Halol (Paresh Bhogilal Nayak) Principal Sr. Civil Judge Panchmahals, Halol Code No. GJ00874 |
Similar Cases
-
Jagdishbhai Tribhovandas Panchal
VsThe Ahmedabad District Co Op Bank Ltd
-
Manoramya Resorts Hotels Private Ltd
VsGovindbhai Vanabhai Bharvad
-
Genral Manager Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
VsThe Spcial Land Acquisition Officer Oil And Natural Gas Ltd
-
Mgvcl
VsDhatu Forge Ltd
-
Genral Manager Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
VsThe Spcial Land Acquisition Officer Oil And Natural Gas Ltd
-
Dahiben W/O Manibhai Punjabhai
VsArvind Garment Park Pvt Ltd Authorised Signatury-Jayesh Narayandas Thakkar
}
Frequently Asked Questions
The Petitioner in case Mgvcl vs Dhatu Forge Ltd is Mgvcl.
The Respondent in case Mgvcl vs Dhatu Forge Ltd is Dhatu Forge Ltd and 2 more.
The case against Dhatu Forge Ltdwas filed on 18-08-2017 by Mgvcl.
The status of case Mgvcl against Dhatu Forge Ltd is Case Disposed.