Case Details

Ms Krbl Ltd. Vs White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd.

Case Details

casenoCase TypeCS (COMM.)
casenoFiling Number7859/2012
casenoRegistration Number512/2019
caseno Filing Date03-12-2012
hearingRegistration Date03-12-2012
hearingFirst Hearing Date10th December 2012
dateDecision Date03rd February 2020
casestatusCase StatusCase Disposed
courtCourt Number and Judge764-District Judge (Commercial Courts)-03;
natureNature of DisposalUncontested--Dismissed As Withdrawn;

Petitioners & Respondents

contactsPetitioner

Ms Krbl Ltd., ;

;

contacts Respondent Name

White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd.;

Order Details

orderdate Order Date26-10-2016 documents

IN THE COURT OF MS.VEENA RANI :ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, PATIALA HOUSE COURTS,NEW DELHI No. 13301 of 16 Title: M/s K.R.B.L. Ltd. Vs. M/s White Field Overseas Pvt. Ltd and anr. 26.10.2016 Present: Sh. A.K.Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendants are ex-parte. Today matter is listed for ex-parte evidence. Adjournment sought by the counsel for the plaintiff on the ground that witness is attending the Hon'ble High Court for his evidence. Put up for ex-parte evidence on 17.12.2016. (VEENA RANI) Addl. District Judge -04 PHC, New Delhi 26.10.2016

orderdate Order Date17-12-2016 documents

IN THE COURT OF MS.VEENA RANI :ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, PATIALA HOUSE COURTS,NEW DELHI No. 13301 of 2016 Title: M/s KRBL Ltd. Vs. M/s White Fields Overseas Pvt. Ltd. And anr. 17.12.2016 Present: Sh. Veerendra Sinha, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendants are ex-parte. Adjournment sought as the witness is busy in evidence in the Hon'ble High Court. Put up for ex-parte evidence on 04.02.2017. ( VEENA RANI ) Additional District Judge-04 PHC, New Delhi/17.12.2016

orderdate Order Date04-02-2017 documents

IN THE COURT OF MS.VEENA RANI :ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, PATIALA HOUSE COURTS,NEW DELHI TM No.13301/16 Title: M/s KRBL Ltd. Vs. White fields Overseas. 04-02-2017 Ld. PO is on half day leave. Present : Sh. Virender Singh Sinha, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. As per directions of Ld. PO Put up on 10.07.2017 for purpose fixed/further proceedings. (Ahlmad) 04.02.2017

orderdate Order Date27-09-2017 documents

IN THE COURT OF MS.VEENA RANI :ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, PATIALA HOUSE COURTS, NEW DELHI TM No. 13301 of 16 Title : M/s KRBL Ltd. Vs. M/s White Field Overseas Pvt. Ltd. 27-09-2017 Present : Sh. Rahul Sharma,Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendants are ex-parte. Adjournment sought by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff on the ground that witness is not available today and witness needs some time to trace the documents to be exhibited in evidence. Put up for ex-parte evidence on 04.12.2017. ( VEENA RANI ) Additional District Judge-04 Judge Code : DL0271 PHC, New Delhi/27.09.2017

orderdate Order Date04-12-2017 documents

TM No.: 13301/16 M/s. KRBL Ltd. v. White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd. 04.12.2017 Present: Ld. Counsel Sh. Amit Chanchal Jha for the plaintiff with Sh.  Sunil Kumar, witness of the plaintiff. Defendant is already ex­parte. Today witness has not brought the original documents therefore, put up  for ex­parte plaintiff's evidence on 05.04.2018.          (CHANDRA SHEKHAR)  Additional District Judge­04 Judge Code: DL003         PHC/New Delhi/04.12.2017

orderdate Order Date05-04-2018 documents

TM. No.13301/16 Ms. KRBL Ltd. Vs. White Fileds Overseas Pvt. Ltd. 05.04.2018 Present : Sh. Rahul Sharma, Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff. Main counsel and the witness are stated to be in Tis Hazari Court in some other case. He seeks adjournment for leading ex-parte evidence. I have perused the record, one last opportunity is given to the plaintiff to lead ex-parte plaintiff's evidence on the next date. Case is at the stage of ex-parte plaintiff's evidence for about three years. Put up for ex-parte plaintiff's evidence on 09.08.2018. (CHANDRA SHEKHAR) Additional District Judge-04 Judge Code : DL0003 PHC, New Delhi/05.04.2018

orderdate Order Date09-08-2018 documents

IN THE COURT OF SH.CHANDRA SHEKHAR :ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, PATIALA HOUSE COURTS, NEW DELHI TM No. 13301 of 2016 Title : M/s KRBL Ltd. Vs. White Fields Overseas Pvt. Ltd. 09.08.2018 Present : Sh. Virender Sinha, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant has already been proceeded ex-parte. Witness Sh. Sunil Kapoor is also present. At the request of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff, one more opportunity is given to the plaintiff to lead ex-parte plaintiff evidence subject to cost of Rs. 5000/- to be deposited in Delhi Legal Services Authority. Put up for filing receipt of deposition of cost and ex-parte plaintiff evidence on 29.10.2018. ( CHANDRA SHEKHAR ) Additional District Judge-04 Judge Code : DL0003 PHC, New Delhi/09.08.2018

orderdate Order Date29-10-2018 documents

TM No. 13301/16 M/s KRBL Ltd vs. M/s Whitefield Overseas Pvt Ltd 29.10.2018 File received by way of transfer. It be checked. Present : Sh. Virender Sinha, ld counsel for plaintiff. Defendant has already ex-parte. Witness Sh. Sunil Kapoor is also present. At request of ld counsel for plaintiff matter be now listed for ex-parte plaintiff's evidence on 28.02.2019. (Sumit Dass) Additional District Judge-01, NDD/PHC/New Delhi/29.10.2018 kp

orderdate Order Date28-02-2019 documents

TM No. 13301/16 28.02.2019 Present: Sh. Amit Chanchal Jha, Ld. Counsel for the  plaintiff with Sh. Sunil  Kapoor AR. Defendant is already exparte. Time is sought on behalf of plaintiff to adduce remaining exparte  PE. Re­notify for ex­parte PE on 03.07.2019          (Sandeep Garg) Additional District Judge­01,         NDD/PHC/New Delhi/28.02.2019

orderdate Order Date15-01-2020 documents

CS (Comm) No.512/19 MS KRBL LTD. Vs WHITE FILEDS OVERSEAS P. LTD. 15.01.2020 Present: Sh. Kamla Naresh, counsel for plaintiff. Defendant is ex­parte. Case received by transfer. It be checked and registered as and when Ahlmad joins. Case is pending for final arguments. Adjournment   is   sought.   Put   up   on  03.02.2020  for arguments.        (Narinder Kumar)            District Judge  (Commercial Court­03)         New Delhi

Final Order Judgement

orderdateOrder Date03-02-2020 documents
CS Comm) No. 512/19 M/s KRBL Ltd. vs. Whitefields Overseas Pvt Ltd & anr. 03.02.2020 Present: Sh. S.K. Bansal with Sh. Kamal Naresh, counsels for  plaintiff. Defendant no.2 is ex­parte. Arguments advanced by counsel for plaintiff to an extent. In the course of arguments, counsel for plaintiff submitted that suit  has already been decreed   against  defendant no.1 vide order 23.05.2013   and   as   such,   he   prayed   that   name   of   defendant   no.2   be dropped   from   the   array   of   defendants.   Accordingly,   vide   separate judgment of even date, name of defendant no.2 has been dropped from the array of defendants.  File reveals that decree sheet has not so far been prepared by   the  concerned  court  which  dealt  with   the  matter  on    23.05.2013. Accordingly,    decree   sheet  be  prepared   in   terms  of   settlement  dated 23.05.2013 between plaintiff and defendant no.1. File be consigned to Record Room.        (Narinder Kumar)            District Judge  (Commercial Court­03)         New Delhi
orderdateOrder Date03-02-2020 documents
CS Comm) No. 512/19 M/s KRBL Ltd. vs. Whitefields Overseas Pvt Ltd & anr. 03.02.2020 Present: Sh. S.K. Bansal with Sh. Kamal Naresh, counsels for  plaintiff. Defendant no.2 is ex­parte. Arguments advanced by counsel for plaintiff to an extent. In the course of arguments, counsel for plaintiff submitted that suit  has already been decreed   against  defendant no.1 vide order 23.05.2013   and   as   such,   he   prayed   that   name   of   defendant   no.2   be dropped   from   the   array   of   defendants.   Accordingly,   vide   separate judgment of even date, name of defendant no.2 has been dropped from the array of defendants.  File reveals that decree sheet has not so far been prepared by   the  concerned  court  which  dealt  with   the  matter  on    23.05.2013. Accordingly,    decree   sheet  be  prepared   in   terms  of   settlement  dated 23.05.2013 between plaintiff and defendant no.1. File be consigned to Record Room.        (Narinder Kumar)            District Judge  (Commercial Court­03)         New Delhi
orderdateOrder Date03-02-2020 documents
 IN THE COURT OF SHRI NARINDER KUMAR  DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)­03,   PATIALA HOUSE COURTS: NEW DELHI CS (Comm) No.512/19 M/s KRBL Limited 5190, Lahori Gate Delhi­ 110006         Also at : A1, Pamposh Enclave Nehru Place, New Delhi And B­81, Sainik Farm, New Delhi.   … Plaintiff versus   1. Whitefields Overseas (P) Ltd (Suit already decreed as compromised on  23.05.2013) 1107­1108, 11th Floor, DLF Tower B, Jasola, New Delhi­110025 2.  Ayman Hamada Brothers Group Jaffa St. Gaza Palestine P.O. Box 62. … Defendants Date of Filing       : 04.12.2012 Date of Judgment : 03.02.2020 CS (Comm) No.512/19                    M/s KRBL Limited vs.    Whitefields Overseas (P) Ltd & Anr.                              Page No.1 of 5                      J U D G M E N T    Plaintiff   company   engaged   in   the   business   of processing, marketing and exporting of variety of rice including Basmati  knocked at   the door  of   the court   feeling aggrieved on account of infringement / violation of its trade mark / label about 'INDIA   GATE'   and   device.   Plaintiff   company   is   also   feeling aggrieved of infringement / violation of its trade mark 'BABAL HIND' .  As a result, plaintiff prayed for decree for permanent injunction so as to restrain the defendants and other, as described in para 41(a)  of  the plaint  so as to avoid infringement of  trade mark / packing material / label.  In addition to relief of permanent injunction, plaintiff company also  prayed  for   relief  of  passing off   its  goods by  the wrong doers as that of the plaintiff, in violation of the aforesaid material / label composition of colour 'INDIA GATE' BASMATI RICE CLASSIC label ( as shown in annexure A).   In para 10 of the plaintiff, plaintiff has described state of process of registration applied for by the said company for the trade   mark   INDIA   GATE   with   or   without   device   of   INDIA GATE, in addition to the goods mentioned in the various clauses with figure in the 4th schedule of Trade Mark Act 1999. CS (Comm) No.512/19                    M/s KRBL Limited vs.    Whitefields Overseas (P) Ltd & Anr.                              Page No.2 of 5                It is also case of the plaintiff that it has copy right in the   aforesaid   trade  mark   /   label   INDIA GATE because  of   the original artistic work and as such it is the owner and proprietor  of the said copy right, got registered under Copy Right Act.  The said trade mark with device of INDIA GATE   forms essential part of the said label.   In paragraph nos. 13 to 15 of the plaintiff, plaintiff has described vast extent of its business. Case of the plaintiff is that defendant nos. 1 & 2 have been found engaged same / similar trade of business as that of the plaintiff i.e. processing, marketing and sale of rice.  In July,  2011, M/s   Daulat   Ram   Ramesh   Kumar   &   Company,   283/E,   Basant Avenue,   Amritsar,   Punjab­143001   &   M/s   Ayman   Hamada Brothers  Group,     Jaffa  ST.  Gaza­Palestine,  P.O.  Box   ­62  were dealing  in  the same business  as   that  of   the plaintiff.  Defendant no.2 is stated to be in collusion with aforesaid   M/s Daulat Ram Ramesh Kumar & Company which adopted and started using trade mark and copy right of the plaintiff in the form and style  of Sabha Basmati   Rice   Classic   deceptively   similar   to   the   brand   of   the plaintiff while exporting goods to defendant no.2.  Accordingly, it served   legal  notice  of  both   these  entities.     In   reply,  M/s    M/s Daulat Ram Ramesh Kumar & Company gave an undertaking not to use the said artistic work. However, defendant no.2 sent vague reply.   CS (Comm) No.512/19                    M/s KRBL Limited vs.    Whitefields Overseas (P) Ltd & Anr.                              Page No.3 of 5                Allegation levelled by the plaintiff is that defendant no.2 dishonestly and with mala fide intention using the impugned mark / label in connivance with the defendant no.1.   Plaintiff is alleged   to   have   learnt   in   the   3rd  week   of   October,   2012   that defendant no.1 indulged in the said activity, as the plaintiff came across impugned goods of the defendant in the market and trade. Hence, this suit.  2. Vide order dated 23.05.2013, plaintiff company and defendant no.1 arrived at an amicable settlement  and accordingly, this suit was disposed of qua defendant no.1. 3.  As regards defendant no.2, it was proceeded against ex­parte. 4.  By   way   of   ex­parte   evidence,   plaintiff   examined PW­1 Sh. Rajesh Oberoi,  Assistant  Examiner from Trade Mark Registry; PW­2 Sh. Deepak Kumar Sinha, Assistant Copy Right from Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street,  Delhi.    Sh Sunil Kapoor­ AR of plaintiff has also been examined twice. 5. Today, in the course of final arguments, counsel for plaintiff has submitted that suit has already been decreed  against defendant   no.1   vide   order     23.05.2013   and   as   such,   name   of defendant   no.2   be   dropped   from   the   array   of   defendants. CS (Comm) No.512/19                    M/s KRBL Limited vs.    Whitefields Overseas (P) Ltd & Anr.                              Page No.4 of 5                Accordingly, name of defendant no.2 is dropped from the array of defendants. 6. File   reveals   that   decree   sheet   has   not   so   far   been prepared by the concerned court which dealt with the matter on 23.05.2013.   Accordingly,  decree sheet  be prepared in  terms of settlement dated 23.05.2013 between plaintiff and defendant no.1.  File be consigned to Record Room. Announced in open Court        (Narinder Kumar) today i.e. on 03rd February,  2020.                     District Judge   (Commercial Court)­03      New Delhi CS (Comm) No.512/19                    M/s KRBL Limited vs.    Whitefields Overseas (P) Ltd & Anr.                              Page No.5 of 5               

Similar Cases

Frequently Asked Questions

The Petitioner in case Ms Krbl Ltd. vs White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd. is Ms Krbl Ltd..

The Respondent in case Ms Krbl Ltd. vs White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd. is White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd..

The case against White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd.was filed on 03-12-2012 by Ms Krbl Ltd..

The status of case Ms Krbl Ltd. against White Fileds Overseas P. Ltd. is Case Disposed.